Which combination best describes a comprehensive approach to identifying gifted students?

• A. A single test score
• B. A nomination by a teacher only
• C. Multiple measures across domains and performance
• D. A check of attendance records

Answer: (C)

Identifying students for gifted programs works best when information comes from multiple measures across different domains and performance over time. This means looking beyond a single test to include varied evidence—classroom work, portfolios, creative and problem-solving tasks, leadership and initiative, and input from teachers, parents, and the students themselves. By triangulating these data, you get a fuller, more reliable picture of a student’s strengths and potential, while reducing the influence of factors like test anxiety, language differences, or cultural bias. That broader approach is more fair and accurate than relying on one metric alone. A single test score, a nomination by a teacher only, or a check of attendance records each fall short because they don’t capture the full range of abilities and talents.